Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release
From: Bill Meier <wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:26:19 -0400
On 10/10/2013 10:56 AM, mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
My vote would be to install in a central location and make it just
another step in

+1


http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html, just
like installing Visual Studio.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release


For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
SDK in a central location on yoursystem  (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything else (which means taking up a lot of
space if you have multiple WIRESHARK_LIB_DIRs)?

Also, should we dump the Qt ZIP archives into SVN or distribute them
separately? Or tell people to download the official version from
qt-project.org? I've signed the DLLs and executables in the archives
above with the Wireshark Foundation key. I'm not sure if Digia does the
same for the official distribution.



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe