Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Proposed Gerrit workflow (was: Re: Notes from Sharkfest '13)
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Martin Kaiser <lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:08:32 +0200
Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):

> I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
> to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
> Please check it and share your opinion.

would that mean that even the most basic change needs peer review and
approval based on the process defined by gerrit?

I'm a bit worried that this doubles the time for such simple changes.  I
often see this in corporate environments where people don't correct
typos, misleading variable names, formatting etc. because they can't be
bothered with the administrative overhead.

Regards,
Martin