Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] lua and ss7 mtp2
From: Cristian Constantin <const.crist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:24:39 +0100
hi!

I am trying to access from a lua script the length indictator field of
the mtp2 protocol.

1. yes, I am sure that the capture contains ss7 mtp2 traffic
2. yes, I am sure that the filter selects the ss7 mtp2 traffic.
3. I am using wireshark:

wireshark -v
wireshark 1.8.2

Copyright 1998-2012 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with GTK+ 2.24.10, with Cairo 1.12.2, with Pango 1.30.0, with
GLib 2.32.4, with libpcap, with libz 1.2.7, with POSIX capabilities (Linux),
with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.9.1, with Lua 5.1, without Python, with GnuTLS
2.12.20, with Gcrypt 1.5.0, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio
V19-devel (built Jul 20 2011 00:01:38), with AirPcap.

Running on Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64, with locale en_US.UTF-8, with libpcap version
1.1.1, with libz 1.2.3.4, GnuTLS 2.12.19, Gcrypt 1.5.0, without AirPcap.

Built using gcc 4.7.2.

does anyone here know why for example this snippet:

local mtp2_li_field = Field.new("mtp2.li")

function tap.packet(pinfo, tvb)
 local mtp2_len = mtp2_li_field()
 print("mtp2 len:", tostring(mtp2_len))
 print("mtp2 len:", tostring(mtp2_len.value))
end

dumps something like:

mtp2 len:       nil
[string "get_isup.lua"]:187: attempt to index local 'mtp2_len' (a nil value)

??

otoh this one:

local mtp2_field = Field.new("mtp2")

function tap.packet(pinfo, tvb)
 local mtp2 = mtp2_field()
 local l = string.byte(mtp2.value,3);
end

barks like this:

[string "get_isup.lua"]:189: bad argument #1 to 'byte' (string
expected, got userdata)

on a more general note, how to use lua in wireshark with binary
protocols when lua
lacks built-in support for working with binary values (i.e.
pack/unpack, oct a la perl)???

I mean I have found and I have used the "struct" package from here:

http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/struct/

but in this case it does not seem to be enough...

thanks a lot!
bye now!
cristian