Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] wireshark:decode GETDEVINFO error when using pnfs-bl
From: fanchaoting <fanchaoting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:00:46 +0800
fanchaoting 写道:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think this has a good chance of getting merged, but it's preferred to have
>> patches submitted as enhancement bugs through bugs.wireshark.org. In this way
>> discussion on the bug stays grouped, won't get lost in the backlog of a mailing
>> list, sample captures (do you have one?) can be harvested for tests, etc.
>>
>
> thanks for telling me, here is the sample captures.
>
> #######################################################################
>
> now when using pnfs block, if recieve a GETDEVINFO packet, the wireshark
> decode this packect error, because GETDEVINFO(block-layout) is Different from
> GETDEVINFO(file-layout). the wireshark now only can decode GETDEVINFO(file-layout).
> but when recieve GETDEVINFO(block-layout), it decode error.
>
> Signed-off-by: fanchaoting<fanchaoting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.c b/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.c
> index 77b6db5..35b5926 100644
> --- a/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.c
> +++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.c
> @@ -407,6 +407,15 @@ static int hf_nfs_op_mask = -1;
> /* NFSv4.1 */
> static int hf_nfs_length4_minlength = -1;
> static int hf_nfs_layouttype4 = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_block_volume_type4 = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_offset = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_sig = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_num_vols = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_start = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_length = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_index = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_chunk_size = -1;
> +static int hf_nfs_bld_stripes = -1;
> static int hf_nfs_layoutreturn_type4 = -1;
> static int hf_nfs_iomode4 = -1;
> static int hf_nfs_stripetype4 = -1;
> @@ -659,7 +668,7 @@ static gint ett_nfs_fh_ex = -1;
> static gint ett_nfs_layoutseg_fh = -1;
> static gint ett_nfs_reclaim_complete4 = -1;
> static gint ett_nfs_chan_attrs = -1;
> -
> +static gint ett_nfs_volume = -1;
> /* what type of fhandles should we dissect as */
> static dissector_table_t nfs_fhandle_table;
>
> @@ -8777,22 +8786,80 @@ dissect_nfs_devices4(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, proto_tree *tree)
> return offset;
> }
>
> +static int
> +dissect_nfs_block_volume4(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, proto_tree *tree)
> +{
> + guint num_vols;
> + guint i, j;
> + guint block_volume_type;
> + guint bld_stripes;
> +
> + /* disect block volume's count*/
> + num_vols = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset);
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint32(tvb, tree, hf_nfs_num_vols, offset);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_vols; i++) {
> + proto_tree *volume_tree = NULL;
> + proto_item *volume_item = NULL;
> +
> + volume_item = proto_tree_add_text(tree, tvb, offset, 4, "volume(%d)", i);
> + volume_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(volume_item, ett_nfs_volume);
> +
> + block_volume_type = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset);
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint32(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_block_volume_type4, offset);
> +
> + switch (block_volume_type) {
> + case BLOCK_VOLUME_SIMPLE:
> + offset += 4;
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint64(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_offset, offset);
> + offset = dissect_rpc_string(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_sig, offset, NULL);
> + break;
> + case BLOCK_VOLUME_CONCAT:
> + break;
> + case BLOCK_VOLUME_SLICE:
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint64(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_start, offset);
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint64(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_length, offset);
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint32(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_index, offset);
> + break;
> + case BLOCK_VOLUME_STRIPE:
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint64(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_chunk_size, offset);
> + bld_stripes = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset);
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint32(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_stripes, offset);
> + for (j = 0; j < bld_stripes; j++)
> + offset = dissect_rpc_uint32(tvb, volume_tree, hf_nfs_bld_index, offset);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return offset;
> +}
>
> static int
> -dissect_nfs_deviceaddr4(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, proto_tree *tree)
> +dissect_nfs_layout_devinfo4(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, proto_tree *tree)
> {
> + guint layout_type;
>
> /* layout type */
> + layout_type = tvb_get_ntohl(tvb, offset);
> offset = dissect_rpc_uint32(tvb, tree, hf_nfs_layouttype4, offset);
>
> /* skip da_addr_body size */
> offset+=4;
>
> + if (layout_type == LAYOUT4_BLOCK_VOLUME) {
> + offset = dissect_nfs_block_volume4(tvb, offset, tree);
> + return offset;
> + }
> +
> offset = dissect_nfs_devices4(tvb, offset, tree);
> + offset = dissect_nfs_notification_bitmap4(tvb, tree, offset);
>
> return offset;
> }
>
> +
> static int
> dissect_nfs_devicelist4(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, proto_tree *tree)
> {
> @@ -9981,8 +10048,7 @@ dissect_nfs_resop4(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, packet_info *pinfo,
> break;
>
> case NFS4_OP_GETDEVINFO:
> - offset = dissect_nfs_deviceaddr4(tvb, offset, newftree);
> - offset = dissect_nfs_notification_bitmap4(tvb, newftree, offset);
> + offset = dissect_nfs_layout_devinfo4(tvb, offset, newftree);
> break;
>
> case NFS4_OP_GETDEVLIST:
> @@ -10280,6 +10346,15 @@ static const value_string layouttype_names[] = {
> { 0, NULL }
> };
>
> +static const value_string blockvolumetype_names[] = {
> + { 0, "BLOCK_VOLUME_SIMPLE"},
> + { 1, "BLOCK_VOLUME_SLICE"},
> + { 2, "BLOCK_VOLUME_CONCAT"},
> + { 3, "BLOCK_VOLUME_STRIPE"},
> + { 0, NULL }
> +};
> +
> +
> static const value_string layoutreturn_names[] = {
> { 1, "RETURN_FILE"},
> { 2, "RETURN_FSID"},
> @@ -11834,6 +11909,42 @@ proto_register_nfs(void)
> "layout type", "nfs.layouttype", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
> VALS(layouttype_names), 0, NULL, HFILL }},
>
> + { &hf_nfs_block_volume_type4, {
> + "block_volume_type", "nfs.block_volume_type", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
> + VALS(blockvolumetype_names), 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_offset, {
> + "bld_offset", "nfs.bld_offset", FT_UINT64, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_sig, {
> + "bld_sig", "nfs.bld_sig", FT_STRING, BASE_NONE,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_num_vols, {
> + "num_vols", "nfs.num_vols", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_start, {
> + "bld_start", "nfs.bld_start", FT_UINT64, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_length, {
> + "bld_length", "nfs.bld_length", FT_UINT64, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_index, {
> + "bld_index", "nfs.bld_index", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_chunk_size, {
> + "bld_chunk_size", "nfs.bld_chunk_size", FT_UINT64, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> + { &hf_nfs_bld_stripes, {
> + "bld_stripes", "nfs.bld_stripes", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
> + NULL, 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> +
> { &hf_nfs_layoutreturn_type4, {
> "return type", "nfs.returntype", FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC,
> VALS(layoutreturn_names), 0, NULL, HFILL }},
> @@ -12474,7 +12585,9 @@ proto_register_nfs(void)
> &ett_nfs_cb_illegal,
> &ett_nfs_chan_attrs,
> &ett_create_session_flags,
> + &ett_nfs_volume,
> };
> +
> module_t *nfs_module;
>
> proto_nfs = proto_register_protocol("Network File System", "NFS", "nfs");
> diff --git a/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.h b/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.h
> index b14bfaa..a3e81e3 100644
> --- a/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.h
> +++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-nfs.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,12 @@
> #define LAYOUT4_OSD2_OBJECTS 2
> #define LAYOUT4_BLOCK_VOLUME 3
>
> +/* pNFS block volume types */
> +#define BLOCK_VOLUME_SIMPLE 0
> +#define BLOCK_VOLUME_SLICE 1
> +#define BLOCK_VOLUME_CONCAT 2
> +#define BLOCK_VOLUME_STRIPE 3
> +
> extern gboolean nfs_file_name_snooping;
>
> extern int dissect_fhandle(tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree,
>
> ----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] wireshark:decode GETDEVINFO error when using pnfs-block
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] -Wmissing-prototypes ??
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] wireshark:decode GETDEVINFO error when using pnfs-block
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] qtshark -> wireshark-qt ?
- Index(es):