2013/3/13 Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I believe when building with autotools and passing --with-qt to
> configure that the resulting binary is still just called 'wireshark'?
> I don't know what happens when you try and build both together, but I
> don't have a problem with that producing wireshark-gtk2,
> wireshark-gtk3 or wireshark-qt as appropriate.
With CMake we can build both together and the qt version is called qtshark.
I plan converting the Debian package to use CMake to ship both and simplify
the build process.
Cheers,
Balint
>
> Evan
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bálint Réczey <balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to suggest renaming the relatively new qtshark binary to
>> wireshark-qt.
>> I believe wireshark-qt would align better with the practice of
>> providing the very same software
>> for different UI toolkits with the same name postfixed by the UI toolkit name.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Balint
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
