Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] FW: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46479: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trun
Hi,
Would using proto_tree_add_bits_item() be less efficient? Possibly that can be improved which would give
A better over all improvement I think.
Regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of martinm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: den 9 december 2012 05:50
To: wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46479: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-per.c
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=46479
User: martinm
Date: 2012/12/08 08:49 PM
Log:
Similarly avoiding calling g_snprintf() in dissect_per_constrained_integer().
Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
Changes Path Action
+7 -1 packet-per.c Modified
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe