(Finally) checked in r44325.
On 07/26/2012 02:09 PM, mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
No, I didn't really want to muck with it. The patch is a single line,
so I can check it in, but I didn't know if I needed to regenerate the
dissector files too, or if that came for "free" somehow (like a
distclean, then build). Sounds like that's a "no".
If I need to have omniorb stuff, and you'd like the patch + the
dissectors checked into a single revision, it'd be much easier if you
did it. Timetable isn't really an issue, I'm just slowly cleaning up
display filters to be ready for the 1.10 release.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, Jul 26, 2012 1:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] idl2wrs generation of display filters
mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was running checkfiltername.pl and discovered that the idl2wrs
generated dissectors don't follow the convention of using the filter
name registered with the protocol as the start of any display filter
name. Was this just an oversight, or was it intentional?
I believe the attached patch will fix the problem, but I don't know the
first thing about the idl2wrs generation or how to regenerate the
necessary dissector files, so I thought I'd send it out for comment.
I don't know much about the IDL stuff but I recently made a bunch of
changes to it (and rebuilt the dissectors). My cheat-sheet for how to
re-generate them came from this check-in comment:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=39932
:-)
(Of course you also need the omniorb stuff, etc. first.)
If you don't want to muck with it I could try to apply this patch and
regenerate but it'll probably be a few days before I'll have a chance.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
