Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patches to properly handle extended responses for NTCreate&X
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 06:08:45 -0700
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:30 PM, ronnie sahlberg
<ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hf_smb_volume_guid   shouldnt this be a FT_GUID ?
>
> Can you try making it FT_GUID and see if it works?

Quite likely, but then so should hf_smb_server_guild in that case ...

> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attached is a patch to handle extended responses for NTCreate&X
>> requests for CIFS.
>>
>> I have tested this patch with captures I have and it seems to decode
>> the additional information correctly.
>>
>> Could someone with commit privileges either push it or let me know
>> what changes are needed please?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Richard Sharpe
>> (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)