Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 41790: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>]

*My* intent was to revert back out my change to go back to what Joerg 
had intended in r34356.  That revision says the intent was "to increase 
common source code coverage".

I think I had also see some comments (r28285, for example) about 
wanting/trying to get the AirPcap GUI working on Linux.  I don't know 
much more than that since I don't have one of the devices to play with. 
 Joerg?

Michael Tuexen wrote:
> What is the reason to use Airpcap by default?
> It is (as far as I know) only supported on Windows platforms, when having some
> software installed. So why compile the stuff on non windows platforms?
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:37 AM, morriss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=41790
> >
> > User: morriss
> > Date: 2012/03/26 07:37 PM
> >
> > Log:
> > Revert r37423: the intent of r34356 was to enable Airpcap by default, it just
> > didn't work as intended.
> >
> > Then make it so we build with Airpcap by default.
> >
> > This should hopefully be the end of https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4879
> >
> > Directory: /trunk/
> >  Changes    Path            Action
> >  +7 -1      configure.in    Modified
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> > Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
> >             mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe