Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] dependent_frames memleak?
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:43:33 -0400
On 04/02/2012 03:07 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:

Hi,

Looking at r41216 I think dependent_frames list should be always freed,
not only in add_packet_to_packet_list().

Can someone review attached patch? Jeff?
Oops, yes, you're right--it leaks memory! :-( And I think your patch is good. 

ps. welcome back!