Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_63

From: Chris Maynard <chris.maynard@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:31:03 +0000 (UTC)

Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@...> writes:

> That's the common way to show the application protocol in SIP message bodies. 
> Most well known is Session Description Protocol in Session Initiation Protocol 
> messages: SIP/SDP.

But dissect_ansi_637_trans_app() calls col_set_str(), not col_append_str(), and
I don't see a col_set_fence() in packet-sip.c, so I don't think we'd see
"SIP/IS-637-A" in the protocol column, but merely, "/IS-637-A".  Is that the
intent?  Or am I missing something and "SIP/IS-637-A" would be displayed after 
all?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
  - From: Jaap Keuter

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
  - From: Bill Meier
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
  - From: Chris Maynard
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
  - From: Jaap Keuter

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] gtk/Makefile.common
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread