Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
From: "Chaswi Przellczyk" <cp70@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:52:12 +0200
Dear Anders, I'm feeling a bit silly here, since "wireshark trunk" only makes sense to me in using the trunk-branch of wireshark to do that and I have found three of those * 1.5 (unstable) trunk * 1.4 (stable) trunk * 1.2 (old stable) trunk But unfortunately I'm unable to find out what you really mean. Sorry. CP -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:44:00 +0200 > Von: Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chaswi Przellczyk > Sent: den 31 mars 2011 10:39 > To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject) > > On 3/30/2011 11:37 AM, Palleske, Carsten wrote: > > Hello all, > > - I've got Windows and I've got MS-VS 2010 Pro. > - I downloaded Source-Code for Wireshark v1.44. > - I downloaded CygWin and Perl and a bunch of tools and got them > installed. > - After getting used to the makefiles and stuff I got wireshark > compiled. No details about that, since I'm not used to Makefile-driven > development. > - I can debug Wireshark from VS2010 > > Ok, this is how far I got without help. > > Now I got into Wireshark and found the point that I want to change or > add something to. Specifically I want to have a little pop-up asking > for > a number at a given point of code from within tap-rtp-common.c > So I got down to wrote some minor dialog (ugh... got to get used to > gtk > development as well) and tried to compile. Naturally I got unresolved > externals, since what I had written hadn't even been compiled. So I > went > looking for tap-rtp-common.c/h in all text files, since that's really > the only file that I'll call into my little dialog anyway. I found > tap-rtp-common.c/h was mentioned in ...\Wireshark\Makefile.common and > in > ...\Wireshark\CMakeLists.txt. So I went right into those and added my > newly created .c and .h files in there. > Now I get > NMAKE : fatal error U1073: "....obj" konnte nicht erstellt werden > Stop. > > That's a bit odd, since it seems to be enough for tap-rtp-common.c/h. > Anyway - what did I miss? Where do I have to tell the Make-utility to > compile my stuff? It doesn't even give any syntax or other c-related > error. > > > First of all: > > > tap-rtp-common is used by both the GUI and non-GUI variants of the > software (Wireshark[GUI], tshark & rawshark[non-gui]. > > So trying to access gtk functions from tap-rtp-common isn't going to work. > > > IOW trying to link to gtk from stuff in any other directory than .../gtk > is a non-starter. :) > > What is it that you are trying to accomplish ? > > ------------------------------------------- > > Dear Bill, > > thanks for your response and forgive the confusion with the > mailing-addresses. I created this account specifically to handle all the wireshark load. > > At the end of tap-rtp-common.c is a function called int > rtp_packet_analyse(...). > Inside rtp_packet_analyse when you go down to /* Dynamic PT */ and go to > the else of that if, there is a statement that says clock_rate = 0; > > Now, for the tests we are performing it is our wish to be able to enter > the clock_rate at that very spot manually. That's what that mini-dialog is > intended for. Just entering a number for the clock-rate. > > It needs to work only in our little environment for our very specific > purpose, so there's no need to find the "big-general-solution", unless it's > even easier. For a starter, we're trying to get started with minimum effort. > > Regards, > Carsten. > > > -- > NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > > If you use wireshark trunk clock rate is extracted from SDP I think, does > that solve your problem? > /Anders > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Fulko Hew
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Chaswi Przellczyk
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Anders Broman
- [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Index(es):