Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
From: "Chaswi Przellczyk" <cp70@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:52:12 +0200
Dear Anders,

I'm feeling a bit silly here, since "wireshark trunk" only makes sense to me in using the trunk-branch of wireshark to do that and I have found three of those
    * 1.5 (unstable) trunk
    * 1.4 (stable) trunk
    * 1.2 (old stable) trunk 

But unfortunately I'm unable to find out what you really mean. Sorry.

CP

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:44:00 +0200
> Von: Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)

>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chaswi Przellczyk
> Sent: den 31 mars 2011 10:39
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
> 
> On 3/30/2011 11:37 AM, Palleske, Carsten wrote:
> 
>     Hello all,
> 
>     - I've got Windows and I've got MS-VS 2010 Pro.
>     - I downloaded Source-Code for Wireshark v1.44.
>     - I downloaded CygWin and Perl and a bunch of tools and got them
> installed.
>     - After getting used to the makefiles and stuff I got wireshark
>     compiled. No details about that, since I'm not used to Makefile-driven
>     development.
>     - I can debug Wireshark from VS2010
> 
>     Ok, this is how far I got without help.
> 
>     Now I got into Wireshark and found the point that I want to change or
>     add something to. Specifically I want to have a little pop-up asking
> for
>     a number at a given point of code from within tap-rtp-common.c
>     So I got down to wrote some minor dialog (ugh... got to get used to
> gtk
>     development as well) and tried to compile. Naturally I got unresolved
>     externals, since what I had written hadn't even been compiled. So I
> went
>     looking for tap-rtp-common.c/h in all text files, since that's really
>     the only file that I'll call into my little dialog anyway. I found
>     tap-rtp-common.c/h was mentioned in ...\Wireshark\Makefile.common and
> in
>     ...\Wireshark\CMakeLists.txt. So I went right into those and added my
>     newly created .c and .h files in there.
>     Now I get
>     NMAKE : fatal error U1073: "....obj" konnte nicht erstellt werden
>     Stop.
> 
>     That's a bit odd, since it seems to be enough for tap-rtp-common.c/h.
>     Anyway - what did I miss? Where do I have to tell the Make-utility to
>     compile my stuff? It doesn't even give any syntax or other c-related
> error.
> 
> 
> First of all:
> 
> 
> tap-rtp-common is used by both the GUI and non-GUI variants of the
> software (Wireshark[GUI], tshark & rawshark[non-gui].
> 
> So trying to access gtk functions from tap-rtp-common isn't going to work.
> 
> 
> IOW trying to link to gtk from stuff in any other directory than .../gtk
> is a non-starter. :)
> 
> What is it that you are trying to accomplish ?
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> Dear Bill,
> 
> thanks for your response and forgive the confusion with the
> mailing-addresses. I created this account specifically to handle all the wireshark load.
> 
> At the end of tap-rtp-common.c is a function called int
> rtp_packet_analyse(...).
> Inside rtp_packet_analyse when you go down to /* Dynamic PT */ and go to
> the else of that if, there is a statement that says clock_rate = 0;
> 
> Now, for the tests we are performing it is our wish to be able to enter
> the clock_rate at that very spot manually. That's what that mini-dialog is
> intended for. Just entering a number for the clock-rate.
> 
> It needs to work only in our little environment for our very specific
> purpose, so there's no need to find the "big-general-solution", unless it's
> even easier. For a starter, we're trying to get started with minimum effort.
> 
> Regards,
> Carsten.
> 
> 
> -- 
> NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!			
> Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
> 
> If you use wireshark trunk clock rate is extracted from SDP I think, does
> that solve your problem?
> /Anders
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit 
gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl