Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
From: "Chaswi Przellczyk" <cp70@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:52:12 +0200
Dear Anders,
I'm feeling a bit silly here, since "wireshark trunk" only makes sense to me in using the trunk-branch of wireshark to do that and I have found three of those
* 1.5 (unstable) trunk
* 1.4 (stable) trunk
* 1.2 (old stable) trunk
But unfortunately I'm unable to find out what you really mean. Sorry.
CP
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:44:00 +0200
> Von: Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> An: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chaswi Przellczyk
> Sent: den 31 mars 2011 10:39
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
>
> On 3/30/2011 11:37 AM, Palleske, Carsten wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> - I've got Windows and I've got MS-VS 2010 Pro.
> - I downloaded Source-Code for Wireshark v1.44.
> - I downloaded CygWin and Perl and a bunch of tools and got them
> installed.
> - After getting used to the makefiles and stuff I got wireshark
> compiled. No details about that, since I'm not used to Makefile-driven
> development.
> - I can debug Wireshark from VS2010
>
> Ok, this is how far I got without help.
>
> Now I got into Wireshark and found the point that I want to change or
> add something to. Specifically I want to have a little pop-up asking
> for
> a number at a given point of code from within tap-rtp-common.c
> So I got down to wrote some minor dialog (ugh... got to get used to
> gtk
> development as well) and tried to compile. Naturally I got unresolved
> externals, since what I had written hadn't even been compiled. So I
> went
> looking for tap-rtp-common.c/h in all text files, since that's really
> the only file that I'll call into my little dialog anyway. I found
> tap-rtp-common.c/h was mentioned in ...\Wireshark\Makefile.common and
> in
> ...\Wireshark\CMakeLists.txt. So I went right into those and added my
> newly created .c and .h files in there.
> Now I get
> NMAKE : fatal error U1073: "....obj" konnte nicht erstellt werden
> Stop.
>
> That's a bit odd, since it seems to be enough for tap-rtp-common.c/h.
> Anyway - what did I miss? Where do I have to tell the Make-utility to
> compile my stuff? It doesn't even give any syntax or other c-related
> error.
>
>
> First of all:
>
>
> tap-rtp-common is used by both the GUI and non-GUI variants of the
> software (Wireshark[GUI], tshark & rawshark[non-gui].
>
> So trying to access gtk functions from tap-rtp-common isn't going to work.
>
>
> IOW trying to link to gtk from stuff in any other directory than .../gtk
> is a non-starter. :)
>
> What is it that you are trying to accomplish ?
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Dear Bill,
>
> thanks for your response and forgive the confusion with the
> mailing-addresses. I created this account specifically to handle all the wireshark load.
>
> At the end of tap-rtp-common.c is a function called int
> rtp_packet_analyse(...).
> Inside rtp_packet_analyse when you go down to /* Dynamic PT */ and go to
> the else of that if, there is a statement that says clock_rate = 0;
>
> Now, for the tests we are performing it is our wish to be able to enter
> the clock_rate at that very spot manually. That's what that mini-dialog is
> intended for. Just entering a number for the clock-rate.
>
> It needs to work only in our little environment for our very specific
> purpose, so there's no need to find the "big-general-solution", unless it's
> even easier. For a starter, we're trying to get started with minimum effort.
>
> Regards,
> Carsten.
>
>
> --
> NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!
> Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
>
> If you use wireshark trunk clock rate is extracted from SDP I think, does
> that solve your problem?
> /Anders
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
--
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit
gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Fulko Hew
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Chaswi Przellczyk
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Anders Broman
- [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Index(es):