Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..()
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:04:28 +0100
Hi,

 -1.

It adds bloat to the API, adding noting really.

Thanks,
Jaap

On 01/12/2011 08:51 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
Wouldn't it be handy to have a proto_tree_new_item_get_val_ which would
return the value
thus avoiding to having do tvb_get_.. in conjunction with
proto_tree_new_item() when the value
is needed in a dissector?

Would an function per field type be necessary? like
proto_tree_new_item_get_val_int32, proto_tree_new_item_get_val_uint32
etc or is there a smarter way of doing it?

Any one interested in implementing it?
Regards
Anders