Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Automatic test for a dissector DLL
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: "news.gmane.com" <AndreasSander1@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:54:47 +0100
"Douglas Wood" <doug.wood@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:37D3213E-8407-4AC8-9149-EA6BBF68EC68@xxxxxxxx...
> But, wireshark is organized to call the PDML print code with all the 
> fields.  It is very easy to "flatten" the hierarchy and choose what to 
> keep.  It is possible that the CSV print code is easier to modify and may 
> do what you want with no modification.  Either that mode did not exist 
> when I started working my own modifications, or I just was clueless about 
> where to get flattened data.

Thanks, I don't want to modify Wireshark. I will have to parse this XML 
output to take only what I need.

--
Andy