Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thinking of some changes to packet-scsi.c ...
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...> writes:
>
>> If there are any suggestions for other changes, let me know.
>
> Hi Richard. It looks like there are other bit-oriented fields besides
> hf_scsi_control that could benefit from this as well: hf_scsi_inquiry_flags,
> hf_scsi_modesel_flags, ...
It is interesting that you mention hf_scsi_inquiry_flags. In my copy
of SCP4-r16 the CMDT bit is obsolete ... I will have to check with
SPC3 though.
> There also seem to be a lot of proto_tree_add_text() calls (I count 186 of
> them). I haven't looked at them all, but I suspect most would be better added
> using proto_tree_add_item() so those fields could be filterable as well.
>
> I saw that you posted a patch on Thursday. Could you open up a bug report and
> submit the patch(es) there instead? I think it will make it easier to track and
> the patches won't get lost. Thanks.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
