Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 34856: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/:?CMakeLists.txt Makefile.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 34856: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/:?CMak

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:04:14 +0100

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:37:34AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> The main reason is that the original code is made for stand alone, run-once 
> operation, while the new code is made for GUI integrated, repeated use.
> 
> Although this has little influence on the lex, the module containing the state 
> machine itself had to be stripped and modified extensively to use wiretap and 
> already available checksum routines.

I'm only talking about the scanner (.l and .h file).

Ciao
 Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

References:

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Filter for generated items
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] SIP Registrations Module
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 34856: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/:?CMakeLists.txt Makefile.am Makefile.common file_import_dlg.c?file_import_dlg.h menus.c text_import.c text_import.h?text_import_scanner.l
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Strange desegmentation code in packet-ssl?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread