Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Generation of display filter based on a field in the pcap
From: Abhik Sarkar <sarkar.abhik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:19:40 +0400
Hi Rohit,

I think what you are looking for is MATE (http://wiki.wireshark.org/Mate).

HTH
Abhik

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rohit Mediratta <rohit_medi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The relation between packets is as follows.

1. Packet A is a request to setup a session. This packet has a unique "request tunnel Identifier" and a "requestIndex".
2. Packet B is a reply, this packet is tunneled with the "request tunnel Identifier" and contains a "reply tunnel Identifier"
3. Packet C is subsequent request packet which is tunneled with "reply tunnel Identifier"
4. Packet D is a subsequent reply packet which is tunneled with "request tunnel Identifier".

NOTE: "tunnel Identifier" are unique in a single direction only, so there is no algorithmic correlation between the "request tunnel Identifier" and "reply tunnel Identifier".

I am looking to generate a view for all packets which are related to the "requestIndex".
I am open to the idea of editing the dissectors to achieve this.

Any ideas/pointers would be very useful.

thanks,
Rohit

> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:25:55 +0200
> From: jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Generation of display filter based on a field in the pcap
>
> On 06/05/2010 11:37 AM, Rohit Mediratta wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to generate a display filter which is based on the the value
> > of a TLV within the pcap.
> > Let me provide an example of a display filter I am trying to generate in
> > the pcap that I have.
> >
> > 1. Packet A has a TLV with value1 and another TLV with value2.
> > 2. Packet B has a TLV with value2 and a TLV with value3.
> > 3. Packet C has a TLV with value3.
> > 4. Packet D has a TLV with value2.
> >
> > I'd like my display filter to be
> > "special_display_filter == value1"
> > When I apply this filter, I'd like all 4 packets to be displayed.
> >
> > This is, ofcourse, my view of how I can achieve this. If there is
> > another methodology to achieve my aim of displaying all packets related
> > to Packet A, then please enlighten me.
> >
> >
> > My final goal is to update the flow_graph to view all 4 packets, when I
> > select "packet flow for any packets related to Packet A". If someone can
> > provide any pointers/hints that would be useful.
> >
> > thanks in advance,
> > Rohit
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> What's the relation between packet A, B, C and D? How do you identify this
> relation from the packets? Your display filter now will only match packet A.
>
> Thanks,
> Jaap
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe