Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Hi. regarding 'visited' bit
From: Ari Yoskovitz <ariyosko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:14:37 +0300
Hi. Thanks for your reply.

I removed my assignment to this bit, but now things act funny.
For example, i am using the re-assembling mechanism, including the hash table.
I added DISSECTOR_ASSERTS for cases when the 'get' operation return a NULL. This should never happen because I am inserting to the hash on the first pass, using the 'visited' bit, and extracting from it on other passes (visited != 0).
However, sometimes, not always, those asserts fails. If that's not odd enough, saving to a file and re-loading it make the problems go away.

Maybe I don't really understand how the 'visited' bit works, or do I?

Thanks.

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/16/2010 03:36 PM, Ari Yoskovitz wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am using the pinfo->fd->flags.visited bit in my dissector.
> I have discovered (after a lot of debugging...) the sometimes this bit
> is asserted even on the first run, namely when the packet was not visited...
> It happens very rarely, but when it does the results are destructive.
>
> Am I missing anything? Is this a bug?

This should never happen. If this is true, that's a bug.
Now the question is, can you define the circumstances when this happens?

> Thanks.
>
> BTW It looks to me that this bit has to be manually set to 1 when the
> packet is being visited for the first time. Again, am I wrong here? Thanks.
>

This is *incorrect*
The EPAN dissection engine handles setting of this bit after the frame was
handed off to the frame dissector. See dissect_packet() in epan/packet.c. You're
supposed to treat this as a readonly value. Maybe this is the cause for the bug
you see?

Thanks,
Jaap
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe



--
Use the source, Luke!