Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Time for 1.2.1?

[Kovarththanan Rajaratnam <krj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gerald Combs wrote:
> Anders Broman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have a considerable amount of fixed bugs in the queue and we are
> > getting a few bug reports on the Windows problems when
> >
> > no IP address is assigned on the interface so perhaps it's time to
> > consider a maintenance release?
> >
> > For the packet-x.c files where only bugfixes has been made should we
> > consider to copy the file across to get the hf blurb fixes
> >
> > copied to keep the sources as equal as possible?
>
> Many of the bug fixes in the queue are serious, and we need to get 1.2.1
> out ASAP. There are several outstanding issues I'd like to get fixed first:
>
>   - Overhaul the IPFIX dissector (bug 3471).
>   - Bug 3672, which appears to be an off-by-one error in the reassembly
>     code.
>   - Review and check in the ZIOP patch attached to bug 3652.
>   - Newer fuzz bugs (3688 and 3696), which I haven't looked at.
>
> I'm working on the IPFIX dissector right now. Anyone want to look at the
> other items?

Both 3688 and 3696 appears to be memory corruption in the Netflow/IPFIX 
dissector. Do you intend on handling these in your overhaul?

--
Best regards,
Kovarththanan Rajaratnam