Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28394: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-vnc.c /tr

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28394: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissector

From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:14:51 -0700

Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On 18. mai. 2009, at 19.23, gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> Log:
>> From Yaniv Kaul via bug 3215:
>>
>> (it also adds some if(tree) ... around some proto_tree_add_item()
>> functions)
> 
> 
> Do we still add such changes?
> 
> All proto_tree_* functions do check for a valid tree, and we have a  
> number of errors occurring because of incorrect usage of "if (tree)".

They've been removed in r28396.

References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28394: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-vnc.c /trunk/: AUTHORS
  - From: Stig Bjørlykke

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28394: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-vnc.c /trunk/: AUTHORS
Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Does this fix the release-notes on the Win32 buildbot?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 28394: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-vnc.c /trunk/: AUTHORS
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Does this fix the release-notes on the Win32 buildbot?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread