Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Small S5066 issue
From: Andriesse Menno <Menno.Andriesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:19:22 +0100
I guess that this question is for me. Apologies for the late response, but I am traveling at the moment.

After a quick look at the source I would say that it should work. (I cannot test right now; traveling...) Can you send me a small capture that shows this behavior?

Cheers,
Menno

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Adamson
Sent: vrijdag 6 maart 2009 15:13
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Small S5066 issue

Hi,
I've been advised by Graeme Lunt to post to this list regarding a small
issue with STANAG 5506 handling.

I'm using wireshark 1.0.6 SVN Rec 27387.

According to S'5066
For S_UNIDATA_IMPLICATIONS:

The following four arguments shall (9) be present in the
S_UNIDATA_INDICATION
S_Primitive if and only if the Transmission Mode for the U_PDU is equal
to Non-ARQ
w/ Errors:
a) The Number of Blocks in Error
b) The Array of Block-Error Pointers
c) The Number of Non-Received Blocks
d) The Array of Non-Received-Block Pointers

The final argument, U_PDU, shall (16) contain the actual received user
data for delivery to
the client.


However when the transmission mode is "Non-ARQ / Broadcast"
Wireshark interprets the U_PDU as the error block.
It then looks like wireshark incorrectly think that the
S_UNIDATA_IMPLICATIONS is malformed.


Cheers,
Peter


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe