Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27554: /trunk/gtk//trunk/gtk/: rtp_a
Hi,
Well if we should require GTK 2.6 as the minimum GTK version or not is a
biger question (2.14 is the current)
So perhaps we should. I think we allready have a few #if
GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,6,0) in the code.
In the meantime i guess "#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,6,0)" is the way to go.
Regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 26 februari 2009 20:39
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27554:
/trunk/gtk//trunk/gtk/: rtp_analysis.c
On Feb 26, 2009, at 8:46 AM, etxrab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=27554
>
> User: etxrab
> Date: 2009/02/26 08:46 AM
>
> Log:
> Another small performance boost.
>
> Directory: /trunk/gtk/
> Changes Path Action
> +17 -25 rtp_analysis.c Modified
Another small performance boost that requires GTK+ 2.6 or later, as it
introduces a call to gtk_list_store_insert_with_values().
Should we remove that performance boost, or remove it if you don't have
GTK+ 2.6 or later, or require 2.6 or later? The Solaris 10 build is
failing because it doesn't have gtk_list_store_insert_with_values()
in GTK+; I don't know whether that's the GTK+ that comes with Solaris
10's Java Desktop Environment (in which case Solaris 10 users would have
to install a newer GTK+ to run Wireshark) or not.
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
