Hi Paul,
That's great. Please try to get some captures through the fuzztester as well.
Thanx,
Jaap
Paul Dietrich wrote:
Jaap,
Thanks. I will build and test. We've got access to many LLRP devices
for testing.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:17 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support
Hi,
What you could do is compile your own Wireshark version with this patch
included
and test the hell out of it. ;)
It's 216 kB of source code to review, I'm not sure if anyone can
allocate his
spare time on it on short notice.
Thanx,
Jaap
Paul Dietrich wrote:
Me too! I can't wait to have this in the production wireshark. Right
now we are relying on a protocol dissector at
http://www.llrp.org/tools/decode.html which is very tedious compared
to
wireshark. Is there something I can do to help?
Regards
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt Poduska
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:26 AM
To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support
Hello,
I'm just curious if anyone on the Wireshark development team has had a
chance to review this dissector recently. I'm interested to know if
there is
anything else I should do to bring it into code compliance.
Thanks, Matt Poduska
