Hi,
Can you share a capture or a screenshot to explain your concern? I
don't know about the others, but I couldn't quite understand what your
point is...
Thanks!
Abhik.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:14 PM, <ding.yufeng1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody
> There are doubts when I was encoding a SIR data Unit over wsp
> protocol.When packing the Application-ID List item, I just pack the
> the header value part of the X-WAP-Application-Id header,omitting the header
> name code 0xAF, but both of them should be packed into the item by
> wireshark1.0.2. I think the header name code is redundant,and the OMA
> gateway source just do so.What about your options?Your reply will be higly
> appreciated!
> Thanks
> Ding
> ########################################
> 丁宇峰
> 网络研究所 业务软件开发一部
> Mail: ding.yufeng1@xxxxxxxxxx
> mobile: 13770766038
> ########################################
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
