Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] tshark and /tmp/etherXXXX files

["Luis EG Ontanon" <luis@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I guess these are very large files. Most people wouldn't bother if they weren't.

So I guess you are doing long running captures and periodically tshark
crashes http://wiki.wireshark.org/KnownBugs/OutOfMemory .

You could "wrap" tshark in a script that cleans behind those files.

A Developer wonders if we can set a call back for when g_malloc() fails?


On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Dan Murphy <danmurphy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just installed v 1.0.2.  Same thing.  tshark leave behind files in tmp.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>
>> >     I'm running v 99.7 and I have a problem where the temp
>> > files are kind of becoming unmanageable.  I noticed my old version
>> > 99.5 does not create these.
>>
>> What happens if you run the *current* version of TShark, which is 1.0.2:
>>
>>        http://www.wireshark.org/news/20080710.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireshark-users mailing list
>> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>



-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan