Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25485:/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: p

["Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I moved the expert item inside of the IF statement instead.

Regards

Anders

 

---

Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Martin Mathieson
Skickat: den 19 juni 2008 14:38
Till: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25485:/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-per.c

 

You just beat me to it.
I wondered if there should be a continue or return following the PER_NOT_DECODED_YET at line 1868?

Martin

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM, <stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25485

User: stig
Date: 2008/06/19 05:36 AM

Log:
 Initialize new_offset.

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
 Changes    Path            Action
 +1 -0      packet-per.c    Modified

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-commits mailing list
Wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits