Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark

["Martin Corraine (mcorrain)" <mcorrain@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

I no longer have those errors. I can now run wireshark. My plugin is
listed but won't turn green when I type it in. But, I'll work on that.
Just wanted to let you guys know. Thanks for the help!!

-martin

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin
Corraine (mcorrain)
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:33 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark

Yes, that is all true. I didn't do anything with the .dll. I left
everything in my ged125 folder. I prepared the make files to make an
installer but didn't do it yet. Should I? I ran the .exe from the
wireshark directory and that gave me those errors as previous stated
below. 

Thanks,
-martin

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 4:23 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark

Hi,

So, you setup a build environment (Win32 I presume?). Then created a
directory
ged125 under the plugins source directory and placed your dissector and
support files there. You made the modifications to the build environment
according to README.plugin and build Wireshark. If not please let us
know.
Then what did you do with the DLL? Did you make an installer? Did you
install that version? Did you move it somewhere by hand?
Somehow it's finding two instances of the dissector and once the fist is
registered the second causes this report. (Or a name hash collision,
which would be very unfortunate).

Thanx,
Jaap

Martin Corraine (mcorrain) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Here is the short story of what I did:
> I wrote my dissector then added it in "plugins\ged125" I changed all 
> the files and what not then I compiled the entire thing. Please note, 
> my dissector isn't functional yet. I basically just got it to compile.

> That may be my problem but I'm not sure. I hope this answers your
question.
> 
> Thanks for your future help :),
> martin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaap Keuter [mailto:jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 3:54 PM
> To: Martin Corraine (mcorrain)
> Subject: Re: wireshark
> 
> Hi,
> 
> When you compile the program tshark is run to create the display 
> filter field list. It runs into the same problem Wireshark does, hence

> produces the same error message.
> 
> Back to the question: Did you develop your dissector as plugin before 
> you moved to a build in dissector?
> 
> Thanx,
> Jaap
> 
> PS: Better keep the discussion on the list, then more enlightened 
> people can chime in ;)
> 
> Martin Corraine (mcorrain) wrote:
>> Hello,
>>  
>> I don't understand your question to me, so I'll rephrase. Thanks 
>> again
> 
>> for replying.
>>  
>> I described my problem wrong. When I compile, towards the end I get 
>> an
> 
>> error (in a window, not inside the dos window). It doesn't like the 
>> unabbreviated version of the protocol name.
>>  
>> Now, when I actually run the .exe from cmd it gives the almost exact 
>> error message about the name. It is as follows (displayed in a dos
> window).
>>  
>>  
>>
>> /Err Duplicate protocol name "The Ged Protocol"! This might be caused

>> by an inappropriate plug-in or a development error."/
>>
>> /                            press any key to exist/
>>
>>  
>>
>> Then, a window pops up and says there was a fatal error. Then, 
>> another
> 
>> window popa up and states:
>>
>>  
>>
>> I appreciate your help,
>>
>> -martin
>>

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev