Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Using glib 2.14.6-2 with gtk+ 2.12.8 on 1.0.0?(win32)
From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:39:12 -0400
The released version uses 2.14.6-2 for GTK2 and 2.14.5 for GTK1 due to some problem that I can't recall at the moment.  (It had something to do with libgmodule, and I think this was the bug reported for it, although I can't verify it right now because the wireshark website is not responding: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2357.)
 
Anyway, I'm not seeing the missing symbol problem.  Probably an obvious question, but did you run a distclean first before trying to build it?  Here's my build configuration from the Help->About window:
 
Version 1.0.0
Copyright 1998-2008 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled with GTK+ 2.12.8, with GLib 2.14.6, with WinPcap (version unknown),
with libz 1.2.3, without POSIX capabilities, with libpcre 7.0, with SMI 0.4.5,
with ADNS, with Lua 5.1, with GnuTLS 1.6.1, with Gcrypt 1.2.3, with MIT
Kerberos, with PortAudio V19-devel, with AirPcap.
Running on Windows XP Service Pack 2, build 2600, with WinPcap version 4.1 beta3
(packet.dll version 4.1.0.1124), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 20080129,
without AirPcap.
Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 build 8804
- Chris

From: Stig Bjørlykke
Sent: Thu 4/10/2008 2:46 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Using glib 2.14.6-2 with gtk+ 2.12.8 on  1.0.0?(win32)

Hi.

I have tried compiling 1.0.0 on a offline windows machine with glib
2.14.6-2 and gtk+ 2.12.8, as used in Makefile.nmake.  When running the
installed binary I get an error message about a missing symbol
g_assertion_message, and wireshark does not start.  Upgrading to glib
2.16.1 solves this problem.

Am I the only one getting this error with 1.0.0?
Which glib is used in the released version?


-- 
Stig Bjørlykke
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev