Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems with epan\oids.c

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Could you point us to these newer versions?

Thanx,
Jaap

Peter Johansson wrote:
> 2008/3/15, Andrew Hood <ajhood@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:ajhood@xxxxxxxxx>>:
>
>     Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
>      > On 13. mars. 2008, at 15.51, Peter Johansson wrote:
>      >
>      >> Could this then be of the same type of issue that is with
>     adns,  hence
>      >> it is required to recompile libsmi too if using
>     another  compiler for
>      >> Wireshark on Windows than MSVC 6. Developer Studio  2005EE for
>     instance?
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > Does it work correctly on win32 with user specified MIBs without
>      > running in the debugger?
>      > Or do we have to make some changes before releasing 1.0?  Like revert
>      > r24569 and live with the memory leakage?
>      >
>      > I'm getting crashes on win32 with 0.99.8 having a custom MIB with
>      > duplicated DESCRIPTION field (attached), so we probably have some
>     more
>      > issues using libsmi...
>
>     Does your custom MIB work if you define it as attached?
>     If it does it might be a libsmi bug.
>
>     --
>     There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
>                    -- Dr. Who
>
>     MY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
>
>     IMPORTS
>            MODULE-IDENTITY, enterprises
>            FROM SNMPv2-SMI
>            ;
>
>     myValues MODULE-IDENTITY
>            LAST-UPDATED "200802270000Z"
>            ORGANIZATION "Private"
>            CONTACT-INFO "Stig"
>            DESCRIPTION  "My Description"
>            REVISION     "200802270000Z"
>            DESCRIPTION  "Version 1.0"
>            ::= { thalesNorwayAS 4 }
>
>     thalesNorwayAS OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { enterprises 3752 }
>
>     END
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Wireshark-dev mailing list
>     Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
> There are more (multiple) recent versions of libsmi than 0.4.5, why was 
> 0.4.5 choosen (perhaps because it was the one that was available at the 
> time of introduction).
> Should a newer version of the library be considered? This might help 
> with some of the crashes, it will not however address the double free 
> calls (on Windows).
>  
> / Peter