Hi,
Patience my friend, patience. With over 250 bug reports and 75 patches
pending it will take some time before anyone gets to it. Especially
since your dissector is not small and very atypical, someone has to a
liking to it and invest the time to verify it. That will take some time.
Thanx,
Jaap
Matt Poduska wrote:
What else needs to be done before this dissector can be added to the
Wireshark source tree? Is there something I've missed in this process?
Thank you,
Matt Poduska
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt Poduska
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 9:45 AM
To: ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx; wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Dissector: LLRP
Done. Any comments?
http://wiki.wireshark.org/LLRP
From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark"
<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Matt Poduska" <mpoduska@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Dissector: LLRP
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 08:46:02 +1100
Please add a page to the wiki for this protocol with some screenshot
and samplecaptures.
See http://wiki.wireshark.org/WakeOnLAN
for an excellent example on what a wikipage should look like.
On Nov 7, 2007 1:42 AM, Matt Poduska <mpoduska@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've submitted a new dissector to be considered for inclusion in
Wireshark,
patch request SVN #1957. It is for the EPCglobal Low-Level Reader
Protocol
(see http://llrp.org for more information). A sample capture file is
included with the patch submission.
Matt Poduska
