Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Distributing a wireshark dissector
From: Andy Lawman <ALawman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:22:41 +0000
I've also been developing a dissector and have followed much the same path as you. I'm developing at home on XP, distributing at work mainly on 2000, but with some PCs on XP. All is well except, oddly, the XP installations at work. First I checked the version of vcredist.exe I was using, but when that looked ok I started to use the /MT compile option to statically link the functions I needed from the runtime library. The resultant dll grew from 10k to 100k, but it worked just fine.
Specifically, in my dissector's Makefile.nmake I added to /MT to the CFLAGS variable at line 12 spilling on to line 13.
Andy.
"Eytan
Kidron" <EytanK@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| "Eytan Kidron"
<EytanK@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Please respond to : Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
Hi,
I have a question concerning the creation and distribution of dissectors.
I created a dissector using a tutorial which I found in http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/custom_dissector.asp, and now I have a dll called my-protocol.dll.
I am not interested, at this point, in distributing this dissector to the general public, but I am interested in distributing it within my organization. I found that I could do that by creating a wireshark installer (see step 12 in the link above).
When others in my organization executed this installer and copied the dll to the appropriate place, they could use the dissector. The problem with that is that whenever a new version of wireshark is released, my dissector will obviously not be there, and if somebody wants some feature from a newer wireshark version and also wants my dissector, they need two separate wireshark installations.
My question is:
Is it possible to add a new dissector to an existing wireshark without having to reinstall it or install a separate instance of wireshark?
One might expect that I could simply copy my-protocol.dll to the folder where all the other dlls are, but when I tried to do this I got an error in loading a C runtime library (incidentally, I am working on Windows XP). Is that supposed to work?
I don't mind the users in my organization having to do something extra (like copying a dll) every time they update their wireshark, if they want to use this dissector, but I don’t want to need to create a new installer whenever a new wireshark version is released.
I would be grateful if anyone could help me with this.
Thanks,
Eytan
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
IMPORTANT - CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressee/s above. It may contain information which is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, printing, distribution, copying, disclosure or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail or using the address below and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
Amadeus Services Ltd, World Business Centre 3, 1208 Newall Road, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW6 2TA, Registered number 4040059
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Distributing a wireshark dissector
- From: Eytan Kidron
- [Wireshark-dev] Distributing a wireshark dissector
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bitfield handling in proto_tree_add_uint_format()
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Distributing a wireshark dissector
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Distributing a wireshark dissector
- Index(es):