Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:04:37 +0100
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 04:57:36PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> If you like, I think we can add a clarification to the pidl output files 
> stating that we do not consider them derived works of pidl.

Thanks, that would be perfect. I've just added a statement to this
extent to the COPYING file of Wireshark, but having it in the generated
code would be even better.


 Ciao
       Joerg

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.