Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector field name changes (was Re: review_for_checkin requested: [Bug 1789] packe

[Richard van der Hoff <richardv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard van der Hoff wrote:
> I think, however, that before you spend too much more time on this, 
> somebody ought to review what you've done so far to check that we're all 
> on the same page with respect to what are good changes. It would be a 
> shame if you spent weeks on it and we had to say "uh, no, you've got the 
> wrong idea."

Apart from anything else, if we go and change half of the dissector 
fields, is that going to upset people who are used to the old names?