Florent Drouin Wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Florent Drouin
>Sent: den 19 juni 2007 14:29
>To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] gsmmap asn1 directory
>
> Hi,
>
>Thank's again for the correction.
>I do not see the warning anymore, but the display of the Facility is
not bellow the facility itself, but at the end of >the tree.
>It's not a problem, but it looks strange..
I'll change it back to the way it was...
>I found an other problem with a recent correction of the "Forward SM"
>message.
>The message for MAP v2, has not the same name as for MAP v3 (a bug was
opened for this).
>With the new ASN1 file, we should not use the old definition
"gsm_old_GSMMAPOperationLocalvalue_vals", but the new one, >else the
correction is lost, and we see mo-forwardSM instead of forwardSM as
message name.
>
><<
>const gchar* gsm_map_opr_code(guint32 val) {
> switch (val) {
> case 44: /*mt-forwardSM*/
> case 46: /*mo-forwardSM*/
> if (application_context_version == 3) {
> return val_to_str(val, gsm_map_V3_opr_code_strings, "Unknown
GSM-MAP (%u)");
> }
> /* Else use the default map operation translation */
> default:
> return val_to_str(val, *gsm_map_opr_code_strings*, "Unknown GSM-MAP
opcode (%u)");
> break;
> }
>}
> >>
The "problem" is that gsm_map_opr_code_strings does not contain all the
opcode values
"gsm_old_GSMMAPOperationLocalvalue_vals" is created from dummy asn1 code
which holds all opcodes
Perhaps the code can be reversed to show "old" values in case of Version
<3 I'd also like to get rid
Of gsm_map_opr_code_strings as it's a subset of
"gsm_old_GSMMAPOperationLocalvalue_vals".
Hopfully we'll be able to auto generate the value_string from asn2wrs
soon.
>In the attached sample of forwardSM, you can see the Forward-SM, and
two additional problems of decoding for "SMS
>Deliver Report". These problems of decoding for sm-RP-UI are not new,
because there are related to the packet-gsm_sms.c >module.
>What is new, with the new ASN1 file, is that the sm-RP-UI is not
decoded for the mo/mt-forwardSM.
>I think the gsmmap.cnf should be updated to call the sms dissector, as
it is done for ForwardSM.
I'll look into it.
>And at least :-), could you update the Unix Makefile to use gsmmap.cnf
and not gsm_map.cnf.
Will do, something whent astray when moving over to the new asn1
files...
Regards
Anders
Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> I Believe I fixed all exept:
>
>> - and one with a Facility with Forward CUG info. For this problem,
>> this is only a display problem, as the information is correctly
>> decoded, but a Warning is displayed at the end of the decoding.
>>
> I see no warning :(
>
> Regards
> Anders
>
>
