Let's disable it by default to avoid the overhead of checking every
packet.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:53:19PM +0800, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> What do you think--how should we go about this?
>
> -J
>
> Glattfelder Christoph (glc) wrote:
> > Hello Jeff
> >
> > Unfortunately, a frame must be searched for the trailer to recognize it as PRP frame. But I see no problem to have it disabled by default.
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Christoph Glattfelder
> >
> > Z??rcher Hochschule Winterthur
> > Institute of Embedded Systems - InES
> >
> > Technikumstrasse 9
> > Postfach 805
> > CH-8401 Winterthur
> > Tel. +41(0)52 260 69 74
> >
> > christoph.glattfelder@xxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > -----Urspr??ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Jeff Morriss [mailto:jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2007 10:26
> > An: Developer support list for Wireshark; Glattfelder Christoph (glc)
> > Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) dissector
> >
> >
> >
> > Meier Sven (msv) wrote:
> >> This is a dissector for the Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) defined
> >> in chapter 6 of the IEC 62439.
> >>
> >> PRP uses two independent networks in parallel and allows redundancy
> >> without switchovers.
> >>
> >> The protocol is sending Mac multicast messages with Ethertype 0x88fb. In
> >> addition to that it adds to every Ethernet frame a 4 byte trailer before
> >> the FCS. The trailer is detected by checking a size field and an
> >> identifier which are part of the trailer. Therefore, if the last 4 bytes
> >> of a frame match a correct trailer they get interpreted as a trailer,
> >> although it was probably not a real one.
> >
> > Is there some way to know if the trailer is going to be there without
> > searching for it? As it is, registered as a postdissector (didn't even
> > know those existed until now), this dissector will get called for every
> > frame--which seems a bit excessive to me.
> >
> > If there's no way to know ahead of time, maybe this dissector should be
> > disabled by default, though I'm not sure how to best go about doing that.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
