Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] Enhancements to dissecting proxy CONNECT sessions
From: Sake Blok <sake@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:27:40 +0200
Hi,

Could someone review the patch I sent in about two weeks ago, it
looks like it has been overlooked.

Thanks,


Sake


On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:49:16PM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is anyone reviewing the patch I sent last week?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Sake
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:43:25AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > At the moment I'm looking into a problem that James Small has reported
> > on the users-list:
> > 
> > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg00047.html
> > 
> > Although the problem seems to be a non-functional re-assembly of
> > the SSL packets when they are proxied. I will take some time to
> > get familiar with the re-assembly code in wireshark...
> > 
> > While looking into the http-dissector I improved a few things on
> > how it dissects a proxy CONNECT session. This is what I have changed:
> > 
> > - added the fields hf_http_proxy_connect_host and -port
> > 
> > - changed proto_tree_add_text to proto_tree_add_string and -uint
> >   so that it's possible to filter on them
> > 
> > - make these two fields "PROTO_ITEM_SET_GENERATED"
> > 
> > - removed the alteration of the ports within pinfo, now the
> >   ports in the column info are not changed to the port used to 
> >   connect to the backend server. It is now possible to use 
> >   follow-tcp-stream again on proxied ssl sessions.
> > 
> > The patch has been tested on FC4.
> > 
> > Could someone review this patch?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > 
> > Sake
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev