Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFC 2508 Dissector

[Donald White <donald_white@xxxxxxxxx>]

Stephen Fisher wrote:
> Thanks for your contribution!  I've committed your changes as SVN 
> revision 21304 with a minor change in a few places that won't affect 
> normal operation of the code:
>
> I changed match_strval() to val_to_str() (see doc/README.developer for 
> usage notes - match_strval() may return a NULL that we don't want and 
> cause a crash if it runs across unexpected data).
>
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Thanks for accepting the changes.  I checked out the current head, 
21337, of the trunk and rebuilt my Wireshark.  It dissected my capture 
file with the RFC 2508 packets just fine.

Don