Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] State of pidl and idl/cnf files?
From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:41:29 +0000
Forgot:

I think this was discussed some 2 years ago or so.
I think the long term plans are that samba owns the idl files and we
only use copies of them.
We on the other hand should own the conformance files and any
conformance files in samba should be deleted   or linked to ours.



On 3/29/07, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello (mostly) Ronnie,

(ignoring the #pragma patch) we have been using the original pidl stuff
from the samba team for quite a while now. What we are not using are the
original .idl and .cnf files. Is this still necessary and if so, what
needs to be done to change this?

Thanks
    Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev