Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Buildbot compile flags
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:07:06 +0100
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:47:35PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> The alternative is to compile with -std=c99 for the long long case, but 
> do we really want to do that?  I agree that -pedantic is a bit too much 
> to tackle, at least for now.  Let's work on warnings with the usual 
> flags for now.

No, the correct way to handle this is to turn off -Werror when this
configure option is used. We really need to be c89 (or whatever)
compliant until all the platforms that wireshark runs on have their
compilers updated to be c99 compliant.

 ciao
     Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.