Hi,
I don't understand. Do you want to share the object/DLL, or the complete
WS source code, or create a patch? Or are you worried about distribution
in the GPL sense?
Thanx,
Jaap
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The question I've actually wanted to ask was: "Is there a way
> to distribute plugin dissectors separately from the Wireshark codebase?"
> The idea being that we review the plugin internally in AMQP working
> group before submitting it to you.
>
> Thanks.
> Martin
>
> ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> > For inclusion into mainline wireshark,
> > please send the patch to the list for revies (unless it is very large
> > in case a url is better)
> >
> > also please provide a few example captures that we can use to test the
> > dissector with.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/21/07, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've written dissector for AMQP protocol (www.amqp.org).
> >>
> >> It's in alpha version and I would like to distribute it among AMQP
> >> working group members to get comments/suggestions.
> >>
> >> Do you think it is appropriate to incorporate alpha version into
> >> Wireshark codebase?
> >>
> >> Or is there some other process already used in situations like this one?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> Martin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
