Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch to decode ERF type 5 record
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: Florent.Drouin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:46:20 +0100
No, the ERF type 5 record has a different header than the PCAP header, but
MTP2 part is not affected.
In fact, the MTP2 (FCS) is not specific to the ERF format, I would say,
MTP2 (FCS) is the standart MTP2, but the checksums are present in the 2
last bytes of the frame.

I could use a new DLT, but this would be to show the additional
informations given in the ERF type 5 header (like a kind of timeslot
information, etc)

Best regards
Florent



                                                                                                                                   
                      Jeff Morriss                                                                                                 
                      <jeff.morriss@xxxxxxxxxx         To:      Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
                      m>                               cc:                                                                         
                      Sent by:                         Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Patch to decode ERF type 5 record              
                      wireshark-dev-bounces@wi                                                                                     
                      reshark.org                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                   
                      02/02/2007 02:31                                                                                             
                      Please respond to                                                                                            
                      Developer support list                                                                                       
                      for Wireshark                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                   






Florent.Drouin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This patch add the decoding of ERF files using the type "Multi Channel
> HDLC".

Does this file format include the MTP2 FCS?  If so, as per my previous
email about the MTP2 patch, (at least) a new WTAP_ENCAP is needed to
distinguish between MTP2 with and without the FCS.

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev