Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
From: Andrej Mikus <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:54:45 +0100
Hi, In the meantime I found Wireshark wishlist and I find my question related to first topic in dissection section at http://wiki.wireshark.org/WishList#head-415ef1ebe1134681b1db49769aa1d8bf027db057 Further check in header files reveals much more info compared to README files. Found that the functionality I was looking for it (partially) achieved by flag in_error_pkt. Also found information about modification of info column. To conclude, the attached patch would be acceptable? Thanks Andrej On Mon, 22.Jan.07 10:37:20 +0100, Andrej Mikus wrote: > Team, > > While troubleshooting wccp traffic it is very useful that Wireshark > goes deep into gre redirected packet and pulls the IP address from it. > It makes it easy to follow tcp stream also when server responses are not > GRE encapsulated. > > There are however also situations when the IP information from top level > is interesting (what router redirected the packet to what wccp client) > and I would like to implement a preference setting to get this kind of > information. > > Some questions: > - Where this preference should be most logical to place? (ip, gre, wccp) > - How to actually implement it? It requires that packet-ip.c when called > for second time should not update columns (and fields for display > filter), but still continues to build tree for detailed display. Is > there any way to find out if the packet being dissected is raw IP > packet, or comes from GRE payload? > > I would like to modify the Info column in all cases to indicate that the > packet is redirected, for example by prepending char '>' to the info, > regardless of dissector that produced it. Is this feasible? I notice > that dissectors call col_clear all the time. Is it possible to modify > the column after packet is completely dissected? > > In next step I am thinking of using '<' to indicate packet returned back > to router, but at this point still need to work out some protocol > details. > > Attached is an example of packet I am concerned about. I hope it would > help to assist. Output I would like to get after my changes is as > follows: > > With new preference disabled (current operation): > No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info > 1 09:50:26.794117 10.254.127.195 10.254.108.228 DCERPC > Request: call_id: 1 opnum: 16 ctx_id: 0 > > New preference enabled (show top level info in summary for wccp redirected frames) > No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info > 1 09:50:26.794117 10.254.127.194 10.254.214.82 GREWCCP Redirected frame > > Frame 1 (282 bytes on wire, 282 bytes captured) > Ethernet II, Src: Cisco_3a:ab:40 (00:0f:35:3a:ab:40), Dst: Ibm_28:99:a8 (00:14:5e:28:99:a8) > Internet Protocol, Src: 10.254.127.194 (10.254.127.194), Dst: 10.254.214.82 (10.254.214.82) > Version: 4 > Header length: 20 bytes > Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) > Total Length: 268 > Identification: 0xac83 (44163) > Flags: 0x00 > Fragment offset: 0 > Time to live: 253 > Protocol: GRE (0x2f) > Header checksum: 0xa42e [correct] > Source: 10.254.127.194 (10.254.127.194) > Destination: 10.254.214.82 (10.254.214.82) > Generic Routing Encapsulation (WCCP) > Flags and version: 0000 > Protocol Type: WCCP (0x883e) > Redirect header > 0... .... = Well-known service > .0.. .... = Alternative bucket not used > Service ID: Unknown (0x59) > Primary bucket index: 72 > Internet Protocol, Src: 10.254.127.195 (10.254.127.195), Dst: 10.254.108.228 (10.254.108.228) > Version: 4 > Header length: 20 bytes > Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) > Total Length: 240 > Identification: 0x9114 (37140) > Flags: 0x04 (Don't Fragment) > Fragment offset: 0 > Time to live: 64 > Protocol: TCP (0x06) > Header checksum: 0xa650 [correct] > Source: 10.254.127.195 (10.254.127.195) > Destination: 10.254.108.228 (10.254.108.228) > Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 1291 (1291), Dst Port: microsoft-ds (445), Seq: 0, Ack: 0, Len: 188 > NetBIOS Session Service > SMB (Server Message Block Protocol) > SMB Pipe Protocol > DCE RPC Request, Fragment: Single, FragLen: 100, Call: 1 Ctx: 0 > > Many thanks for your cooperation > > Andrej Mikus > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Attachment:
my_patch.gz
Description: application/gunzip
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
- From: Andrej Mikus
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
- From: Andrej Mikus
- [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warning about radius directory
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warning about radius directory
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Prevent recursive IP dissector to fill summary columns
- Index(es):