Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 19901: /trunk/ /trunk/dtds/: mscml.dtd /trunk/packaging/

[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

martinm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=19901
>
> User: martinm
> Date: 2006/11/15 05:27 PM
>
> Log:
>  From Olivier Jacques:
>  
>  Here is a DTD for the MSCML protocol, draft-07. This implementation is not entirely up-to-date (draft-09 is out), but this is a good base to start from.
>   
>  I updated the WIKI with info, snapshot and sample capture: http://wiki.wireshark.org/MSCML
>
> Directory: /trunk/dtds/
>   Changes    Path          Action
>   +280 -0    mscml.dtd     Added
>
> Directory: /trunk/packaging/nsis/
>   Changes    Path             Action
>   +1 -0      wireshark.nsi    Modified
>
> Directory: /trunk/
>   Changes    Path           Action
>   +1 -0      Makefile.am    Modified
>
>   
Is there a reason to not use a wildcard in the wireshark.nsi file? Or 
the other way around, are there *.dtd files that should not be included 
in the setup?

By simply using *.dtd we wouldn't need to change this file "all the 
time" a new dtd is added (and therefore won't be forgotten).

Regards, ULFL