Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] COPY_ADDRESS and g_malloc()
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:33:28 +0000
may be we should have EP_COPY_ADDRESS, SE_COPY_ADDRESS and
PE_COPY_ADDRESS instead.


On 11/13/06, Kukosa, Tomas <tomas.kukosa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Hi,

does not it make sence to change g_malloc() in COPY_ADDRESS to
se_alloc() ?
It seems that it is not freed in most cases of usage.
Do wee need anywhere longer lifetime then se_alloc() has?

Tomas



_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev




--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan