Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] dccp: support for variable-length checksums
From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:06:37 +0000
This patch adds support for correct computation of variable length DCCP checksums as specified in RFC 4340, section 9. Previously wireshark was unable to compute these checksums, only full-coverage checksums could be validated. This patch * makes checksum computation dependent upon the header CsCov field (cf. RFC 4340, 5.1) * removes the case where checksums are zero (unlike UDP/packet-udp, from which the code stems, zero checksums are illegal in DCCP (as in TCP)) * fixes a minor typo - missing bitshift of the CCVal field The patch has been tested against latest automatic build, correctness of checksum computation has been manually validated; sample traces can be supplied. I would like to see this merged, in particular since a Linux kernel patch for DCCP partial checksums already exists. Thanks, Gerrit Renker --- packet-dcp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- wireshark-0.99.4-SVN-19738/epan/dissectors/packet-dcp.c.orig 2006-10-30 14:52:53.000000000 +0000 +++ wireshark-0.99.4-SVN-19738/epan/dissectors/packet-dcp.c 2006-10-30 14:53:02.000000000 +0000 @@ -541,6 +541,16 @@ } /* end while() */ } +/* compute DCCP checksum coverage according to RFC 4340, section 9 */ +static inline guint dccp_csum_coverage(const e_dcphdr *dcph, guint len) +{ + guint cov; + + if (dcph->cscov == 0) + return len; + cov = (dcph->data_offset + dcph->cscov - 1) * sizeof(guint32); + return (cov > len)? len : cov; +} static void dissect_dcp(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree) { @@ -595,7 +605,8 @@ /* DBG("dcph->data_offset: %d\n", dcph->data_offset); */ dcph->cscov=tvb_get_guint8(tvb, offset+5)&0x0F; /* DBG("dcph->cscov: %d\n", dcph->cscov); */ - dcph->ccval=tvb_get_guint8(tvb, offset+5)&0xF0; + dcph->ccval=tvb_get_guint8(tvb, offset+5) &0xF0; + dcph->ccval >>= 4; /* DBG("dcph->ccval: %d\n", dcph->ccval); */ dcph->checksum=tvb_get_ntohs(tvb, offset+6); /* DBG("dcph->checksum: %d\n", dcph->checksum); */ @@ -662,15 +673,11 @@ proto_tree_add_uint(dcp_tree, hf_dcp_ccval, tvb, offset + 5, 1, dcph->ccval); proto_tree_add_uint(dcp_tree, hf_dcp_cscov, tvb, offset + 5, 1, dcph->cscov); - /* checksum analisys taken from packet-udp */ + /* checksum analysis taken from packet-udp (difference: mandatory checksums in DCCP) */ reported_len = tvb_reported_length(tvb); len = tvb_length(tvb); - if (dcph->checksum == 0) { - /* No checksum supplied in the packet */ - proto_tree_add_uint_format_value(dcp_tree, hf_dcp_checksum, tvb, - offset + 6, 2, dcph->checksum, "0x%04x (none)", dcph->checksum); - } else if (!pinfo->fragmented && len >= reported_len) { + if (!pinfo->fragmented && len >= reported_len) { /* The packet isn't part of a fragmented datagram and isn't truncated, so we can checksum it. @@ -703,7 +710,7 @@ break; } cksum_vec[3].ptr = tvb_get_ptr(tvb, offset, len); - cksum_vec[3].len = reported_len; + cksum_vec[3].len = dccp_csum_coverage(dcph, reported_len); computed_cksum = in_cksum(&cksum_vec[0], 4); if (computed_cksum == 0) { proto_tree_add_uint_format_value(dcp_tree, hf_dcp_checksum, tvb,
- Follow-Ups:
- [Wireshark-dev] tvb parameter
- From: prashanth joshi
- [Wireshark-dev] tvb parameter
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] The builbot is "deeply red" seem to be caused by h248 changes
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] The builbot is "deeply red" seem to be caused by h248 changes
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] tvb parameter
- Index(es):