Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Further HTTP woes...
Thank you! My intent was really not to add more work to
others, but to investigate how to solve the problem on my own. I appreciate your
offer. Since that solution is "real", I will not spend any time on my
"conversation" hack.
Thanks again,
Bryant
:-)
I have example captures of some x509 related protocols
running atop http which show this.
I will try to look into implementing
this in the tcp layer this weekend.
On 9/8/06, Bryant
Eastham <beastham@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What
nagle algorithm! Did I forget to mention that we *wrote* the TCP/IP
stack
and that it is running on a small microprocessor? ;-)
Seriously, this
behavior is coming out of Tomcat Web Server/3.3.1 Final
(JSP 1.1; Servlet
2.2). We do, however, have our own implementations in
which nagle is not
available. I would have to check with the developer
to see if he has
disabled anything - I doubt
it.
Thanks,
Bryant
________________________________
From:
wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of ronnie
sahlberg
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006
5:32 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re:
[Wireshark-dev] Further HTTP woes...
"I now have the following
problem. It is common for our implementation
to
dump the headers in one
segment and then dump the data in the next, with
no
Content-Length."
Why does it send this as two segments?
You have not
disabled NAGLE have
you?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev
mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
