Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: new dissector for IBM Communication Tools
From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:28:29 +0200
Ehm, now with the attached file ... Playing with wireshark and refreshing my burried C knowledge I created a new dissector for the protocol by shameless copying most of it from packet-daytime.c and others. The protocol itself is simple enough, a simple string as the payload of an udp packet, string parts are divided by a ":". I'm interesting whether the implementation would be ok and what could be make better. Thanks for any reply. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster
/* packet-ict.c
* Routines for ICT packet dissection
* Copyright 2006, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
* Copied from packet-daytime.c
*
* Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer
* By Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*/
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
# include "config.h"
#endif
#include <epan/packet.h>
#include <epan/strutil.h>
static int proto_ict = -1;
static int hf_ict_string = -1;
static gint ett_ict = -1;
/* This dissector works for UDP IBM Communication Tools packets */
#define ICT_PORT 1510
// we have an UDP packet with a string as a payload like
// "name@xxxxxxxxxx:0:0:Hamburg:Hamburg:12345 Germany:12345:DE:"
//
#define ICT_FIELDS 8
static const char *fields[ICT_FIELDS] = {
"Email",
"Unknown",
"Counter",
"City",
"Country",
"Location",
"Postal Code",
"Notes Domain"
};
static void
dissect_ict(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree)
{
proto_tree *ict_tree;
proto_item *ti;
gint offset = 0;
const guchar *line;
gint next_offset;
int linelen;
int len;
int i;
if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL))
col_set_str(pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL, "ICT");
linelen = tvb_find_line_end(tvb, offset, -1, &next_offset, FALSE);
line = tvb_get_ptr(tvb, offset, linelen);
if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO)) {
col_add_fstr(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO, "%s",
pinfo->destport == ICT_PORT ? format_text(line, linelen) : "");
}
if (tree) {
ti = proto_tree_add_item(tree, proto_ict, tvb, 0, -1, FALSE);
ict_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(ti, ett_ict);
next_offset = -1;
for (i = 0; i < ICT_FIELDS; i++) {
offset = next_offset + 1;
if ( (next_offset = tvb_pbrk_guint8(tvb,offset,-1,":")) >= linelen)
break;
len = next_offset - offset;
proto_tree_add_text(ict_tree, tvb, offset, len, "%s: %s", fields[i],
format_text(tvb_get_ptr(tvb, offset, len), len));
}
}
}
void
proto_register_ict(void)
{
static hf_register_info hf[] = {
{ &hf_ict_string,
{ "ICT", "ict.string",
FT_STRING, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0,
"ICT protocol", HFILL }}
};
static gint *ett[] = {
&ett_ict,
};
proto_ict = proto_register_protocol("ICT Protocol", "ICT", "ict");
proto_register_field_array(proto_ict, hf, array_length(hf));
proto_register_subtree_array(ett, array_length(ett));
}
void
proto_reg_handoff_ict(void)
{
dissector_handle_t ict_handle;
ict_handle = create_dissector_handle(dissect_ict, proto_ict);
dissector_add("udp.port", ICT_PORT, ict_handle);
}
Attachment:
pgpDmZ5us8ujw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: new dissector for IBM Communication Tools
- From: Jaap Keuter
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: new dissector for IBM Communication Tools
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] new dissector for IBM Communication Tools
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Patch for bug 1092 - need review
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] new dissector for IBM Communication Tools
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: new dissector for IBM Communication Tools
- Index(es):