Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
From: "Cook, Timothy" <tcook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:51:01 -0400
My mistake, the distclean should be used after the verify_tools. > -----Original Message----- > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Cook, Timothy > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:47 PM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues > > You may want to include: nmake -fmakefile.nmake distclean as > the first step. This will get rid of auto generated files > that may cause initial Win32 build to fail. > > -Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve > > Grinwis > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:47 PM > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues > > > > I'm going to work up a path to the readme.win32 to include this > > information. I think it would be a good idea to include standard > > build instructions something like this: > > > > To get a standard build working: > > > > To start setup and download all the required packages: > > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup > > > > To verify that you have all of the tools required to build > Wireshark: > > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools > > > > To build Wireshark: > > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake > > > > To get Wireshark Ready to run: > > Nmake -f Makefile.nmake install-deps > > > > > > > > Did I forget anything? If that's all the required steps to get a > > running ethereal, then I'll make up a patch for > > readme.win32 and we'll > > go from there. Having this kind of info would have been a > great help > > when I started working with Ethereal/Wireshark > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter > > Johansson > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 9:58 AM > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues > > > > One have to remember though to run nmake with the > install-deps build > > target after every recompilation of the source (for any change you > > make). Otherwise Wireshark is started with the old compiled code. I > > can't remember the amount of times I have been trying to > debug my code > > and it just does not seem to be executing what I just rewrote. > > > > Why is the install-deps build target not a default operation when > > building on Windows? Is there a reason for it? > > > > / Regards, Peter > > > > Steve Grinwis wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Using the install-deps build target fixed the problem. > > It works like > > > a charm (well... it loads the plugin). Now the only problems > > that > > > I have are ones with my code. And I can deal with my > > code. Thanks > > so > > > much! > > > > > > -Steve > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > > Jaap Keuter > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 5:11 AM > > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Isn't that why we have the install-deps build target? > > > > > > Thanx, > > > Jaap > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> I rebuilt Wireshark to see if I could find any errors in > > the build. > > >>> > > > I > > > > > >>> came across a few things. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> <SNIP> > > >> > > >> > > >>> rm -rf 0.99.2 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> It actually removes the 0.99.2 directory after it builds the > > >>> > > > plug-ins. > > > > > >>> And the whole "Cannot find module" error looks very > similar to the > > >>> > > > error > > > > > >>> I get at run time. Any thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> On windows, you can't run Wireshark from the build > directory. The > > >> > > > makefiles > > > > > >> temporarily create an environment that can run the exe > to generate > > >> > > > some docs > > > > > >> etc., then destroy it. > > >> > > >> I have a batch file that I run after building that copies all the > > >> > > > dll's and > > > > > >> exe's to the appropriate places that a previous standard > > install has > > >> > > > created > > > > > >> and I then run the app from there. > > >> > > >> You can also install nsis and make an installer, but that > > takes a lot > > >> > > > longer > > > > > >> than just copying the executables. > > >> > > >> Graham > > >> > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-dev mailing list > > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain > confidential > > information, privileged material (including material > protected by the > > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute > > non-public information. > > Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in > > error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this > > information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or > > reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not > > authorized and may be unlawful. > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-dev mailing list > > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > _______________ > > Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by > > MessageLabs. For more information please visit > http://www.ers.ibm.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > > _______________ > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > ______________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by > MessageLabs. For more information please visit > http://www.ers.ibm.com > ______________________________________________________________ > _______________ > > ______________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by > MessageLabs. For more information please visit > http://www.ers.ibm.com > ______________________________________________________________ > _______________ >
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Bug 1001] free() invalid pointer in dissect_802_3 at packet-ieee8023.c:71
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ethereal to Wireshark issues
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] libcrypt: need version 1.1.42 or higher
- Index(es):