Wireshark-commits: [Wireshark-commits] master-1.12 96e5b50: Do the PCR and the original PCR the sam
From: Wireshark code review <code-review-do-not-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:22:54 +0000 (UTC)
URL: https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=96e5b50ceecd87e36663357dff6b8d166e71f313
Submitter: Martin Kaiser (wireshark@xxxxxxxxx)
Changed: branch: master-1.12
Repository: wireshark

Commits:

96e5b50 by Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx):

    Do the PCR and the original PCR the same way.
    
    In both cases, make the extension a 16-bit variable, cast the result of
    extracting the extension to guint16 to clarify that only the 9 bits
    visible through the mask matter.
    
    While we're at it, there's no need to use
    "proto_tree_add_uint64_format_value() if the format is just the standard
    format for a 64-bit unsigned integer.
    
    Change-Id: I8f1f48595830d4672984f3797be1c9d994e64ea0
    Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/4043
    Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    (cherry picked from commit 7143bd72f9bc47f40f07763a9ef32459eaa5b311)
    Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/4072
    Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@xxxxxxxxx>
    

Actions performed:

    from  881eb5c   packet-netflow.c: fix bug: "top-of-stack" --> "bottom-of-stack"
    adds  96e5b50   Do the PCR and the original PCR the same way.


Summary of changes:
 epan/dissectors/packet-mp2t.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)