Wireshark · Wireshark-commits: Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 18930: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-tcp.c

Wireshark-commits: Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 18930: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissector

From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:56:14 +1000

looks good to me

On 8/17/06, ulfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <ulfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=18930

User: ulfl
Date: 2006/08/16 08:52 PM

Log:
Don't mark a TCP packet as a "Duplicate ACK" if the flags don't have the ACK flag set (IMHO it's not an ACK in that case). This happens sometimes between FIN and RST packets.

Ronnie, could you check if this change is ok?

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
Changes Path Action
+3 -2 packet-tcp.c Modified

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-commits mailing list
Wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits

References:
- [Wireshark-commits] rev 18930: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-tcp.c
  - From: ulfl

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-commits] rev 18935: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dcerpc-epm.c packet-dcerpc.c packet-dcom-cba.c packet-dcom-remact.c packet-dcom-remunkn.c packet-dcom.c packet-dcom.h /trunk/epan/: ...
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 18935: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dcerpc-epm.c packet-dcerpc.c packet-dcom-cba.c packet-dcom-remact.c packet-dcom-remunkn.c packet-dcom.c packet-dcom.h /trunk/epan/: ...
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-commits] rev 18930: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-tcp.c
Next by thread: [Wireshark-commits] rev 18931: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-dcerpc-afs4int.c packet-dcerpc-conv.c packet-dcerpc-fldb.c packet-dcerpc-nt.c packet-dcerpc-rs_pgo.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread